tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2948758950274593048.comments2008-10-23T23:42:09.020-05:00Let's get it Left! (b/c the right is so wrong)UliPelehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01505167982842820702noreply@blogger.comBlogger29125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2948758950274593048.post-86850839455725670632008-10-23T23:42:00.000-05:002008-10-23T23:42:00.000-05:00Still think Obama's campaign more ethical and hone...Still <A HREF="http://pelerising.blogspot.com/2008/09/myth-of-librul-media.html?showComment=1222494780000#c8882769045609047492" REL="nofollow">think Obama's campaign more ethical and honest than McCain's</A>? If so, you must be missing <A HREF="http://nooilforpacifists.blogspot.com/2008/10/annoyed.html" REL="nofollow">fradulent contributions to Obama the lefty media rarely reports</A>.@nooil4pacifistshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16688417615117569825noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2948758950274593048.post-32201945355405325082008-10-14T23:57:00.000-05:002008-10-14T23:57:00.000-05:00I know I'm beating a dead horse, but I note that O...I know <A HREF="http://nooilforpacifists.blogspot.com/2008/10/prediction-five.html" REL="nofollow">I'm beating a dead horse</A>, but I note that <A HREF="http://nooilforpacifists.blogspot.com/2008/10/depends-on-what-you-mean-by-lobbyist.html" REL="nofollow">Obama's "no lobbyist" policy is riddled with exceptions</A>.@nooil4pacifistshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16688417615117569825noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2948758950274593048.post-29546958446846542702008-10-11T12:08:00.000-05:002008-10-11T12:08:00.000-05:00McCain made a poor choice in wearing a washed-out ...McCain made a poor choice in wearing a washed-out blue shirt and striped tie. Obama looks much sharper in his crisp white shirt and bright red tie.<BR/><BR/>Oh, and Obama makes sense!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2948758950274593048.post-55216001331505837562008-10-03T23:10:00.000-05:002008-10-03T23:10:00.000-05:00BTW, want to guess where Obama places on the list ...BTW, want to guess where Obama places on <A HREF="http://nooilforpacifists.blogspot.com/2008/10/chart-of-day.html" REL="nofollow">the list of recipients of donations from employees and PACS of the now-bankrupt Lehman Brothers</A>?@nooil4pacifistshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16688417615117569825noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2948758950274593048.post-72445869434497802282008-09-30T21:03:00.000-05:002008-09-30T21:03:00.000-05:00ulipele:Read again: those numbers were contributi...ulipele:<BR/><BR/>Read again: those numbers were <A HREF="http://nooilforpacifists.blogspot.com/2008/09/chart-of-day_25.html" REL="nofollow">contributions over the past decade</A>! It's not wise to claim others are inaccurate when your research seems uniformly sloppy.@nooil4pacifistshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16688417615117569825noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2948758950274593048.post-88827690456090474922008-09-27T00:53:00.000-05:002008-09-27T00:53:00.000-05:00Tha's just the contribution analysisi of one y...Tha's just the contribution analysisi of one year. Sheesh -- more proof of your inability to accurately research matters and put them in proper context. <BR/><BR/>McCain has 19 former lobbyists of Fannie & Freddie running his campaign and shaping his policy.UliPelehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01505167982842820702noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2948758950274593048.post-62630449294342481152008-09-26T01:19:00.000-05:002008-09-26T01:19:00.000-05:00Oh, on Obama's ties to Freddie/Fannie: of anyone i...Oh, on Obama's ties to Freddie/Fannie: of anyone in the House or Senate in the past decade, <A HREF="http://nooilforpacifists.blogspot.com/2008/09/chart-of-day_25.html" REL="nofollow">he received the second most campaign contributions from Fannie/Freddie PACs and individuals</A>--despite <A HREF="http://obama.senate.gov/about/" REL="nofollow">serving fewer than four years</A>.@nooil4pacifistshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16688417615117569825noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2948758950274593048.post-63434887023318878712008-09-23T07:52:00.000-05:002008-09-23T07:52:00.000-05:00Re that "inaccurate attack ad attempting to tie Ob...Re that "inaccurate attack ad attempting to tie Obama to Fannie/Freddie," further research is needed: <A HREF="http://nooilforpacifists.blogspot.com/2008/09/chortle-of-day.html" REL="nofollow">McCain's source was the <I>Washington Post</I> itself</A>, which then went into distorted contortions trying to deny it. The MSM is in the tank for the Democrats, as usual.@nooil4pacifistshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16688417615117569825noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2948758950274593048.post-9814608036903163282008-09-20T12:53:00.001-05:002008-09-20T12:53:00.001-05:00It's clear that you spend a large amount of time a...It's clear that you spend a large amount of time analyzing the media, but still disagree with your premise.<BR/><BR/>Just to reassure myself, I did go and check the first 5-10 of of your claims. This was made awkward by your lack of a compiled bibliography, so I had to follow a bunch of links. Credible researchers compile a bibliography to ease the process. But I plowed through a few of your UliPelehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01505167982842820702noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2948758950274593048.post-41592158465413245852008-09-15T15:33:00.000-05:002008-09-15T15:33:00.000-05:00ulipele--it's a good thing you're kidding, because...ulipele--it's a good thing you're kidding, because otherwise I'd have to note (1) the irony of an author who posted no data and little in the way of supporting links critiquing my comment as "unscientific"; (2) failing to address MSM admissions that they're liberal; (3) ignoring that most big-media endorsing candidates endorse Democrats; and (4) dismissing links to <A HREF="http://@nooil4pacifistshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16688417615117569825noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2948758950274593048.post-43896584926593620442008-09-14T00:55:00.000-05:002008-09-14T00:55:00.000-05:00First, I think it's pretty clear that my blog is o...First, I think it's pretty clear that my blog is opinion and half-parody. Even so, I spot checked your links. It's funny that the first one points to a piece that refers to its own statistics as coming from a "very unscientific survey" of something like 100 journalists. Most of the rest are from your own blog. <BR/><BR/>There's this pesky thing called correlation vs. causation (or "correlation UliPelehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01505167982842820702noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2948758950274593048.post-50688849136464250712008-09-13T19:09:00.000-05:002008-09-13T19:09:00.000-05:00Do you research before you write? 1) The press ov...Do you research before you write? <BR/><BR/>1) The press overwhelmingly <A HREF="http://www.nytimes.com/2004/08/01/politics/campaign/01points.html?ex=1249099200&en=11800ba25496a8cc&ei=5090&partner=rssuserland" REL="nofollow">prefers</A>, <A HREF="http://nooilforpacifists.blogspot.com/2005/05/press-bias-summary.html" REL="nofollow">votes for</A>, and <A HREF="http://www.ibdeditorials.com/@nooil4pacifistshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16688417615117569825noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2948758950274593048.post-77769046753646758282008-09-09T17:15:00.000-05:002008-09-09T17:15:00.000-05:00Thanks for commenting, Allie! I had a similar reac...Thanks for commenting, Allie! I had a similar reaction. <BR/><BR/>Sadly, I talked with a friend of mine who is an attorney, and his response was, "it OUGHT to be illegal," (implying maybe it technically isn't). Ugh.UliPelehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01505167982842820702noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2948758950274593048.post-55093242127550400092008-09-09T16:53:00.000-05:002008-09-09T16:53:00.000-05:00I seriously think I'm going to puke. Down with Pa...I seriously think I'm going to puke. Down with Palin!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2948758950274593048.post-5466533130404234442008-09-09T00:47:00.000-05:002008-09-09T00:47:00.000-05:00Notice how the mainstream media hasn't picked this...Notice how the mainstream media hasn't picked this up yet? It was published on SUNDAY, SEPT 8. So much for the alleged "librul" media conspiracy...UliPelehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01505167982842820702noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2948758950274593048.post-45382948920044093402008-09-08T23:31:00.000-05:002008-09-08T23:31:00.000-05:00Oops my own narcissism had me posting without prev...Oops my own narcissism had me posting without previewing.<BR/><BR/>It should read "how does she know? that God would give a crap"Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2948758950274593048.post-80596374655313356712008-09-08T23:28:00.000-05:002008-09-08T23:28:00.000-05:00How does she know? that would give a crap about a ...How does she know? that would give a crap about a pipeline? the state of people's hearts? What nerve!<BR/><BR/>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Narcissistic_personality_disorderAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2948758950274593048.post-90069993253417770152008-09-08T22:46:00.000-05:002008-09-08T22:46:00.000-05:00Welcome to the UCSAUnited Christian States of Amer...Welcome to the UCSA<BR/><BR/>United Christian States of AmericaAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2948758950274593048.post-24583434622660704992008-09-08T14:10:00.000-05:002008-09-08T14:10:00.000-05:00Thanks for the comment! I obviously was using hype...Thanks for the comment! I obviously was using hyperbole in the original post. Nobody knows what really happened. I can imagine a much more innocent scenario on both ends ... something like this:<BR/><BR/>DNC worker #1: Darn! We're out of boxes, and we have all these flags left! <BR/><BR/>DNC worker #2: Well, we have these garbage bags that will at least keep them clean during transport. Let's putUliPelehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01505167982842820702noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2948758950274593048.post-84246152815890713292008-09-08T10:25:00.000-05:002008-09-08T10:25:00.000-05:00Okay, the wiki article is disputed, so here's anot...Okay, the wiki article is disputed, so here's another viewpoint (admittedly just the 2nd page that comes up when you google it.<BR/><BR/>A greater breakdown of specific dispensations is possible, giving most traditional Dispensationalists seven recognizable dispensations.<BR/><BR/>Innocence - Adam<BR/>Conscience - After man sinned, up to the flood<BR/>Government - After the flood, man allowed to UliPelehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01505167982842820702noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2948758950274593048.post-47056354237339814182008-09-08T10:14:00.000-05:002008-09-08T10:14:00.000-05:00LOL I had to look up the meaning of dispensational...LOL I had to look up the meaning of dispensationalist. Now that I know what it means, I totally agree!<BR/><BR/>From wikipedia:<BR/><BR/>Dispensationalism advocates a form of premillennialism in which it sees the past, present, and future as a number of successive administrations, or "dispensations" (Eph 3:2, KJV), each of which emphasizes aspects of the covenants between God and various peoples UliPelehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01505167982842820702noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2948758950274593048.post-77052405903659303542008-09-08T08:12:00.000-05:002008-09-08T08:12:00.000-05:00Sounds like a cheap McCain stunt to get publicity ...Sounds like a cheap McCain stunt to get publicity from their ministers of propaganda at Fox News.Sandy Gholstonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03077070689534459900noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2948758950274593048.post-11568374668044865882008-09-07T21:58:00.000-05:002008-09-07T21:58:00.000-05:00"Maybe they're all encased in that "cone of silenc..."Maybe they're all encased in that "cone of silence" along with Governor Palin."<BR/><BR/>HA-ha! Good point. Thanks for the comment!UliPelehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01505167982842820702noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2948758950274593048.post-12598890612213598842008-09-07T21:40:00.000-05:002008-09-07T21:40:00.000-05:00Rock on. I can't vote for anyone who is a dispens...Rock on. I can't vote for anyone who is a dispensationalist.Laurenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08409258587879004276noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2948758950274593048.post-27101206928512820462008-09-07T18:58:00.000-05:002008-09-07T18:58:00.000-05:00"McCain should be a man"No fooling! As far as I ca..."McCain should be a man"<BR/><BR/>No fooling! As far as I can tell, he's a handmaiden to the Washington elite!postingonblogshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01345879791405208561noreply@blogger.com